|
T R U T O N
|
|
The Rational Unified Theory Of Nature
|
by
Kalman
Klim Brattman
|
Give me
the simplest form of matter and motion,
and I will build, out
of them, the world of
Nature.
|
|
   
|
"Give
me matter, and I will construct a
world out of it."
Immanuel
Kant, Kant's Cosmology
("Universal
Natural History and Theory Of
Heavens")
|
|
11A. Galaxy
Formation and Their Spinning
Charactheristic
|
|
|
In the previous
page, we provided a blueprint of gravity and star formation. Now, it
is the aim of this page to continue
with that blueprint trend in taking
a look at galaxies. We start
with their births.
The
Universe that was endowed, from
its birth, with a spin will
generate a whirling xenofluid
around its axis of spin (AOS),
i.e., a vortex. The nearby stars
will be sucked in creating a star
cluster that will grow in
density with time by acquiring
many more stars that will fall in.
And that continuos grow in star
acquisitions is due to the
volatility of the Universe's AOS that continuously
fluctuates executing undulated
wavelike motions resulting from
uneven gravitational pools of its
nearby constituents.
Eventually with the overgrow of
that star cluster, becoming now a
megacluster (MEG), the
Universe's vortex of its AOS will sputter out
that MEG. That emerged
spinning MEG thrown out by the
vortex marks the birth of a galaxy
endowed with the AOS vortex spin from
its birth. We mark that
recognition in
Pursuant
to the finite
evolutionary mark of creation (FE-UMOC), no act of
creation (AOC) in Nature
can exist without a finite end.
And that apply, of course, to the
Universe itself, to galaxies, to
stars, and so on.
The end of a
galaxy begins, from its birth,
with the sustained loss of its
constituting stars. Two
independent factors act in the
galaxy demise:
|
i)
one, in
the gradal deaths of
its stars,
ii) the
other, in
the "vanishing" act
performed by its
"center" due to its
spin, as detailed
below.
|

After an extended
period of time (that could be
billion of years), that sustained
star loss will eventually reach a
point, called the critical
point of peril (cripop),
when the galaxy's morphology will
change dramatically towards total
extinction transforming itself not
into Nothingness (by the permanent
existential mark of creation, PE-UMOC), but into stellar
"parts."

#1
|

First
Galactic Theorem of
the Spin (1st GATOS)
|
|
A
galaxy, from its
birth, is endowed
with a
self-destructive
mechanism of
eliminating
its own constituting
stars.
|
|
Proof:
By 15th
FURON, a
galaxy, from its
birth, is endowed with
a spin around its own
axis of spin (AOS). As
such, the vortex
"hole" (vorhol)
around that AOS will
begin sucking-in the
closest stars from its
AOS. Now, because the
galaxy's AOS is
neither solid nor
fixed, its permanent
wavelike fluctuation
will attract new
close-by stars to
"fall" into its vorhol.

Once inside the
galaxy's vorhol,
those fallen stars
will get
"suffocated"
resulting ultimately
in their premature
death. As in the
case of a babygal
that prior to its
births was ejected
from the Universe's
vorhol, a
"suffocated" star
will have the same
expellable fate.
Now, because of
those repeated
expels, the galaxy's
vorhol
will become "empty"
repeatedly, being
capable, each time,
of taking in new
fall-in "victims."
That
self-destructive
process will
continue unabated
until the galaxy's
bitter end.
|

Remarks:
1.
A baby
galaxy (babygal), as is
being catapulted from
the Universe's vorhol, could
collide with another
revolving galaxy and
be "swallowed" by it.
That kind of galactic
cannibalism
(galacan) is not
unusual.
2.
On a
global scale of the
Universe, galacan
becomes a grabbing
galaxy (grabgal)
whose axis of
spin (AOS)
coincides with
that of the
Universe. Now,
grabal
has
become the
seat of the Universe's
vorhol. As
such, grabal
by being now
a vorhol
galaxy
(vorgal)
will begin the
process of
sucking-in and
"gobbling" its
nearby
galaxies. An
example of
such a galacan
is provided by
grabal
UGC 12914
galaxy (left)
sucking-in the
UGC 12915
galaxy that
are nicknamed
Taffy
galaxies.

 ==>
Addendum: Taffy
galaxies are
currently being represented
as an example
of galaxy
collisions
(galcolls).
That
representation
is not correct
because the
sucking-in
phenomenon
(accretion)
needs not be
confused with
a galaxy
collision
(galcoll)
as they are
totally
different
phenomena.
< > Aside
from Baby
Galaxies
(Babygals)
and close
by to the
Universe's axis
of spin (AOS)
galaxies,
there are no
other galaxy
collisions (galcolls)
in the
Universe
because of its
dominating
radial centrifugal force of the intrinsic spin
that a spinoverse is endowed with, from its
birth. As
stated, galaxy accretion (galacc) needs not be
confused with
a nonexistent
galaxy
collision (galcoll)!
< >
Taffy galaxies
are
not an
example of a galaxy collision (galcoll), but represent the vortex
"hole"
(vorhol) phenomenon where the axis of spin (AOS) of the Universe
coincides with
the axis of
spin (AOS) of
the Taffy
galaxy UGC
12914 (on the left).
|

#2
|

Second
Galactic Theorem of
the Spin (2nd GATOS)
|
|
All
galaxies, upon
formation, will
begin rushing away,
diagonally, from the
Universe's axis of
spin.
|
|
Proof:
The
proof is a
straightforward
consequence of the
recognition that the
Universe is a spinning
entity. With that
recognition in place,
we further recognize
the existence of the radifugal and transifugal
forces of its spin
that act concomitantly
in concert.
|

#3
|

Third
Galactic Theorem of
the Spin (3rd GATOS)
|
|
No
galaxy can run away
indefinitely from
the Universe's axis
of spin.
|
|
Proof:
A
galaxy is kept
together by its axis
of spin (AOS). That
AOS is not rigid,
being as such
bendable.
The
strength of the
dominating
centrifugal (CF)
force of the
spinning Universe,
increases with
distance from the
AOS of the Universe.
As such, there will
exist a finite
distance, far away
from the AOS of the
Universe, where the
CF-force will be so
strong that it will
overwhelm the
galaxy's AOS
resistance. The
galaxy, at that
critical distance,
will loose its
identity and
disperse, being the
end of galaxy's
existence in
conformity with the
finitude
characteristic of
creation.
|


The
Murky Observational Galactic
(MOG) Zone
Observations,
regardless how precise they may
be, are notorious unreliable when
done outside of our known habitat
be it at the atomic/subatomic nano
level or at the cosmic/galactic
macro level.
It
was Werner
Heisenberg, through his HOIP, who first
recognized of the impossibility of
obtaining an accurate picture of
the world "below" at the
atomic/subatomic level since in
order to "see" that world, we need
to have light! But light, as
Heisenberg famously recognized,
when "on," is disturbing in a
significant way that nano world
providing to us, as such, a much
distorted picture. He beautifully
articulated that very point in his
1933 Nobel address.
==> Paraphrasing
Werner Heisenberg: "What
we observe is not
Nature itself, but is
Nature exposed to our
method of
observation!"
Now at
the macro cosmic level, the
observational method is of little
use as they provide a superimposed
2-dimensional imageries in a
3-dimensional Cosmos. As such,
from that flat superimposed
2-dimensional formed pictures, we
can get only a useless
superimposed galactic imagery
(galagery). The famous
"evolutionary" classification
provided by Edwin Hubble is based
on that kind of superimposed
imageries.
The
galactic images (galmages)
provied by the Hubble
telescope (on the left) as
well as the newest enhanced 10
billion dollars Webb telescope
(on the right) have ZERO
scientific values in guiding us
towards a rational theory
of galaxy formations/evolution or
of any other cosmic formation and
evolution.
|
Making
no mistake:
Out of
that sort of
photographic data, no
galaxy formation and
evolution theory can
ever be build on. In
fact, no observational
data alone can
be a substitute for a
rational theory
of the Cosmos.
Speculative
Cosmology (Specos),
based on the collected
observational data
(visual or
photographic), should
never ever be a
substitute for the Rational
Cosmology (Raticos)
obtained from rational
deductive reasoning
free of speculations
(as the one provided
by the leading
speculative Big-Bang
theory).
Instead of leaving
alone questions that
lack a rational
explanation and follow
Isaac
Newton's
guidance of "framing
no hypotheses," a
plethora of
speculations over
speculations appears
to cover those gaps
of knowledge (GOKs)
with valueless
dazzling cosmic
imagery.
What
a sorrow state, the Cosmology has
been and continues to
be in!
|

The
Galaxy Distribution
and
Morphology
Conundrum
|
As a result that conundrum, of
finding a reliable method in
obtaining accurate description of
the Cosmos, we introduce now
|
The Galactic
Observational
Indeterminacy (GOI)
Principle
|
No
rational theory of
the Cosmos can be
inferred from
cosmic photographic
imagery (cospim).
|
The roots and connotations of a cosmic theory of Nature
should always
spring from
deductive
reasoning
rather than
from
speculation
backed by cospim.
|
.
|
|
|
|
The
GOI's Parallel
Corollary
|
|
The GOI
Principle leads
us to the recognition
that, at the cosmic
level, there is a
limit, called Cosmic
Observational Limit
(COLIM), beyond
which we cannot get
accurate
representations.
|
|
Remark: The GOI
Principle of
the world "above"
(i.e., of the
cosmic-world) leading
to COLIM,
reveals the parallel
that exists with the
world "below" (i.e.,
with the atomic-world)
as recognized first by
Heisenberg
in the
observational limit
there, leading us to UBOF.
|
|
|
The GOI's Foundational Corollary: On the Nonexistence of
Galaxy
Clusters
|
 
The
Sixteen Foundational
Universal
Recognition Of
Nature
(16th FURON):
The
galactic
hierarchical
ceiling
is the highest
evolutionary
formation in a
universe.
|
|
No
galaxy clusters,
nor any higher
evolutionary
hierarchical cosmic
plateaus (cosplons)
exist in Nature.
And that is
because no such
physical mechanism
exists for a galaxy
cluster
to be formed nor
for any other
cosmic formation
within a universe.

Max Planck
|
All
referenced galaxy
clusters
(such as the Virgo
Cluster,
the Fornax
Cluster,
the Hercules
Globular
Cluster,
or the Coma
Cluster)
do not exist in
Nature. They exist
only in some
photographic
plates that
represent
composite
superimposed
images of distant
unrelated
galaxies, for
crying out loud.
|
|
|
|

|
The galaxy is indeed the ultimate tiered evolutionary structure (TES) in a universe, including ours, of course. As such, we
can talk about
the universe's
galaxy
ceiling
that is the
universe's evolutionary top (evotop)
formation.
|
|
|
|
  
|
 
|
|
|