Give
me the simplest form of
matter
and motion,
and I will build, out of them, the world
of Nature.
"Give me matter,
and I will construct a world out of it."
Immanuel
Kant, Kant's Cosmology
("Universal
Natural History and Theory Of
Heavens")
5.
On Energy, Mass, and the Formation of
Embryonal Nature (Embryna)
In the previous page, we have introduced
Prena
as the primeval given
entity consisting of various
xenobase
(XB)
blocks gliding at various constant speeds, in
various directions, in the surrounding
absolute
vacuum (AVA)
space. That linear translatory (LITRA)
motions of those moving objects are representing
the givenprimeval dynamics (PriDyn)
that originates in Prena
(pN).
LITRA motion
is thus an integral part of Prena.
As
ingredients, the xenobase (XB) was considered to
be the givenprimeval material ingredient, while the
absolute vacuum (AVA) was considered to
represent the givenprimeval non-material component. We have
called prematter
(pM)that primeval admixture of
xenobase
(XB)
and absolute
vacuum (AVA).
Finally, we have called
baseholon
(bHL)
a XB-block with holes of
AVA
in it that were called
holeons
(Øs).
Continuing
now with our examination of
Prena
(pN),
we recognize that the only events that are
possible to exist there, are the
collisions of its various
XB-blocks.
Thus, if anything is to be created in Prena,
then the Collision
must be the Creator therein as there is nothing
else out there that could exist in creating
anything. The acts of creation that
Collision
would create ought to be of two kinds:
one,
that can produce
stable,
self-sustained states of existence
that exist after the cause that
created them is no longer present,
and
the
other, that can produce
unstable
states of existence that cannot
sustain themselves once they have
been created.
In our attempt to build up Nature from the
Principles of TRUTON, our primary
interest, of course, is in the self-sustained,
stable acts of Creation. In Prena,
the only creations that could emerge are those
evolving from the given
primal xenobase
(XB)
blocks and their primal linear
translatory (LITRA)
motions.
Notwithstanding
the distinctiveness of those two types of
creations, they nevertheless embrace certain
common characteristics that are at the
substratum of all creations as recognized
in
The
Fourth
Universal Transcendental
Principle Of TRUTON
(4th UTPOT): TheUltimate
Marks Of
(Material)
Creation (UMOCs)
.
1.
A
stable, self-sustained inanimate state
of existence that was created has the
natural tendency to stay idle and
preserve its created state of existence
barring the existence of an active
undercutting agent. We call that
characteristic the
preservation
tendency mark of creation
(PT-UMOC). .
2.
To
a created stable, self-sustained
inanimate state of existence, we can
associate, by
PT-UMOC,
a resistance
to change
(RETOC)
that is limited in strength and, call
that characteristic the
resistance
limit mark of creation
(RL-UMOC). .
3.
A
non-null state of existence (created or
given) can never ever be able to be
transformed or reduced into a null
state of existence as there is no
transformation or process that can
achieve that end. That is to say that
an existing non-null state can never
ever be made to disappear and thus be
reduced or transformed into
Nothingness--an
entity devoid of everything but its own
existence and, whose "fabric" is the
absolute
vacuum
(AVA).
We call that characteristic, the
permanent
existential mark of creation
(PE-UMOC). .
4.
There
is no physical transformation in Nature
or anywhere else that can convert
Nothingness
into a non-null state of existence.
That is to say that a no-null state of
existence can never be created out of
the null state of existence. We call
that characteristic, the
substantive
foundational mark of creation
(SF-UMOC). .
5.
A
material state of existence that was
able to be created in one place, can be
created in a multitude of other places
of similar conditions as there is no
rationale from barring that to happen.
We call that characteristic, the
multitude
existential mark of creation
(ME-UMOC).
6.
A
material state of existence can never
ever be characterized by parameters or
processes whose values are infinite, be
it in magnitude, duration, or
evolution. All material parameters and
processes of a creation in Nature have
finite values.
No physical parameter of a
material creation can increase
or decrease in its value
indefinitely.
No natural process in Nature
can ascend or descend
indefinitely.
No act of creation can evolve
and ascend indefinitely in
Nature without a finite end,
called the evolutionary top
(evotop),
as being the creation's
ceiling of
existence.
We call that multiple finitude
characteristic, the
finite
value mark of creation
(FV-UMOC).
Now, to the
ultimate
marks of creation
(UMOCs)
expressed in the above
4th UTPOT,
we add below these remarks:
.
Remark
1: The preservation tendency
mark of creation (PT-UMOC)
assures that barring the existence
of an undermining agent, a newly
formed state of existence will
preserve indefinitely its new
acquired state of existence. In
particular, we note the preservation
of the xenobase (XB) is implemented
through BAREC. .
Remark
2:The
resistance limit mark of creation
(RL-UMOC)
implies the existence of a
concealed base resisting
(COBAR)force
to
change its status and which when
applied to motion leads to the
concept of inertia and of the
existence of an endowed inertial
force (inforce).
For linear motions, we
can talk about linear
inertia (linin) that
become visible in an
accelerated or
decelerated linear
motion.
For
rotational motions, we
can talk about
rotational inertia
(rotin), known also
as the moment of
inertia, that
becomes visible through
the effects of the well
known radialcentrifugal (CF)
force and of the less
known
transversal
Coriolis and
Euler
forces.
Contrary
to the current ill-existing
representation, these
concealed
base resisting
(COBAR)
forces are not
fictional, fictitious, or
apparent as they are being
purported to be, but they
are REAL existing
independently from our own
existence!
(BTW,
Physics does not deal
with fictional, imaginary
entities and concepts as
they are not part of its
studies!) .As
motion is a REAL phenomenon
being independent from our
own existence, so is the
inforce
that emerges from motion.
The real existence
of
inforce
surfaces
when motion transforms from
a constant velocity to a
variable one --be it a
variation in direction or a
variation in speed.
.The
recognition that motion is
endowed from its birth with
a force --the inertial
force (inforce)
brings us to the monumental
unifying recognition of
Nature vested into
The
FourthFoundational
Universal
Recognition Of
Nature
(4th
FURON): Force
as the
Ultimate
Substratum Of
Nature
(USON)
Force
by being the
integral part of
both
mattter
and
motion
(mamo)
represents the
ultimatesubstratum
of Nature
(USON),
with matter being
endowed with
compressional
force
(comforce)while
motion being
endowed with the
inertial
force
(inforce).
Remark
3:Prematter
(pM)
was defined as an admixture of
xenobase
(XB)
and absolute
vacuum
(AVA),
and wrote this symbolically
pM={XB, AVA}.
Now,
both the
XB
and AVA
can be infused with
inforce
generating a compressional
xenosubstance (cXS) andan "infused" vacuum to be
called below ergovoid
(erV),
respectively.
Defining
Types of Matter
and
Mass
We
call matter
(M)
the newly created admixture
of
cXS
and
erV
and write this
symbolically
M={cXS, erV}.
Now,
the
compressed
xenosubstance
(cXS)
could be
xenofluid
(XF)
or
xenorigid
(XR).
We call elusive matter
(elma or
elM),
the matter composed of
xenofluid
(XF)
and, call regular matter
(reM),
the matter composed of
xenorigid
(XR).
Symbolically, we can write
all this as follows:
elM={XF, erV}
andreM={XR, erV},
respectively.
Finally,
we call regular mass
or simply mass the
amount of
regular
matter
an object has.
Objects made of
elusive
matter
(elma)
are said to have null
mass and called
nullons. They simply
are said of being
massless. Objects made of
regular
matter
are said to have
regular
mass
and called massons.
.
Remark
4: The
permanent existential mark of
creation (PE-UMOC),
assures that no object or
constituent of Nature could ever be
able to disappear and transform into
Nothingnessaka, into an
absolute
vacuum
(AVA).
On that front, Nature's objects and
constituents are said to be endowed
with a permanent existential
characteristic (PEC). .Remark
5: By the substantive
foundational mark of creation
(SF-UMOC),
it follows that Einstein's
relativistic
mass
formulated in his Special Theory of
Relativity is an impossibility to
exist being thus a lunacy devoid of
any sense. Mass cannot be created
out of Nothingness
through motion or through any other
physical process. .
Remark
6: By the recognition of
multiple places of existence as
noted above under ME-UMOC,
we recognize that isolated
parcels of Nature, called
naturets,separated by
the absolute
vacuum
(AVA)
medium, are in existence. That
recognition is able to provide for
us with the most general
representation of Nature --that of
being an aggregate of
naturets
separated by the
AVA
medium. Our
naturet
where
our Universe resides, is always
writen with a capital letter,
Naturet. .
Remark
7: By the finitude,
i.e., by the finite value
mark of creation (FV-UMOC),
it follows that no creation can
exist indefinitely. Every creation
in Nature has a beginning and an
end, and thus has a finite
duration.
By
evotop,
evolution cannot ascend
indefinitely as it must have build
into it, an induced
self-destructive (selfdes)
mechanism. We mark that
recognition into
The
FifthFoundational
Universal Recognition Of
Nature
(5thFURON): On
the Finitude Mark of
Evolution
Evolution
cannot continue to ascend
in perpetuity as, from its
birth, it must be endowed
with an ascended
self-destructive
(selfdes)
mechanismthat
ultimately will
lead to its
demise.
Discovering
the selfdes
mechanism for each type of
evolutionary formation, be
it for the
inanimated matter
(like that of a star
or galaxy) or for
animated matter
(encompassing evolutionary
biological mass
extinctions) is
paramount in understanding
the underlying
finitudeevolutionary
mechanisms that governs
Nature.
In the pages to
follow,
we will reveal in detail
some of those
selfdes
evolutionary
mechanisms.
While
here,
let us note now that in
Prena
(pN),
the sole primeval physical
parameter in existence is the
density. And that
implies that out of the
density concept
(densicon), all other
physical parameters and states
of existence must be created
or derived from. We mark that
remarkable recognition
into
.
The
Fifth
Universal
Transcendental
Principle Of TRUTON(5th UTPOT): Density
--The
Ultimate
Physical
Parameter Of
Nature
(Tuppon)
The
material density, by
being the sole
primeval physical
parameter of
Prena,
stands therefore at
the foundation of all
other physical
parameters to be born
out of
Prena
(such as temperature,
gravity, etc.). In
this respect
therefore, the
material density
represents the
ultimate physical
parameter of Nature
(uppon) from
where all other
physical parameters
and states of
existence must be
created, rooted, or
derived
from.
By the
finite
value mark of
creation
(FV-UMOC),
it follows that the
material density nor
any other physical
parameter can reach
the infinite value
--a concept of
Mathematics that has
no counterpart or
meaning in the
physical realm of
Nature.
Only
to non-physical
mental
concepts or entities
(such as the
Space
or Time)
we can associate, in
a meaningful manner,
infinite
parameters.
The
simple recognition that an increment in density
(and nothing else) of the xenobase (XB)
substance will generate --through compression--
all the available new qualitative states of
existence of the compressed xenobase (cXB),
makes us realize that the variation in one
direction of a physical parameter will
eventually lead to new qualitatively material
states of existence. A qualitatively new state
will "pop-up" from the old state as a
result that its physical parameter will fall
outside the range of RETOC
associated with that old state of existence. We
mark this central recognition of how a
new state of existence is being born out of an
old one in
.
. The
Sixth Universal
Transcendental
Principle Of TRUTON
(6th UTPOT): The
Pop-Up Principle Of Creation
(PUPOC)
A
physical parameter of a particular
state of existence by continuously
increasing or decreasing its value
will eventually reach a point where
its value will fall outside the
rangeits resistivity to
change (RETOC)
of that particular state. When that
happens, a new qualitatively state
of existence, called popup,
will emerge as it will be
popping-up. Thus, always a
new state of existence (i.e., a
popup) is being created
through an abrupt pop-up jump
or saltation.
Sub-Remark
A:
In Evolutionary Biology, this
leaping (or the pop-up) principle
represents its pillar in
understanding the formation of a new
species where the gradual cumulative
trait in one single direction will
lead into the "popping-up" of
a new species. The evolutionary
"leaps" are therefore a
straightforward consequence of this
principle and it represents the
cornerstone of understanding how new
species are being formed: not
through a linear continuous
transformation, but through
evolutionary "jumps" or "leaps" or
"saltations" as recognized first in
1972 by the American paleontologists
Niles Eldredge and Stephen
Jay Gould of Harvard
University.
Sub-Remark
B:
The first recognition that in
general "quantitative change
leads to qualitative change" was
done by the great German idealist
philosopher Georg Wilhelm
Friedrich Hegel who in 1874
published the Encyclopaedia of
the Philosophical Sciences
where, in its section "The Logic,"
he gave this beautiful example with
respect to the consequences of the
variation of temperature for
water:
G.
W. F.
Hegel
"...
the temperature of water
is, in the first place,
a point of no
consequence in respect
of its liquidity: still
with the increase or
diminution of the
temperature of the
liquid water, there
comes a point where this
state of cohesion
suffers a qualitative
change, and the
water is converted into
steam or ice."
[Underline
supplied.]
Karl
Marx
.However,
Hegel
considered all
that
recognition as
being a Law of
Logic or
Thought rather
than a Law of
Nature. It was
the philosophy
of Karl Marx
and Friedrich
Engels that
reversed
completely that
dialectics
created by
Hegel and
transformed it
into a
materialistic
dialectics
where Hegel's
laws became
laws of Nature
rather than
laws of
Thought.
Indeed, Karl
Marx in his
Das
Kapital,
vol.1 noted
that Hegel's
idealism "is
nothing else
than the
material world
reflected by
the human mind,
and translated
into forms of
thought"
turning thus
Hegel's
dialectics
"upside down."
Changing direction, and turning our attention to
the motion
--the other primeval given
ingredient of Prena
(pN),
we enunciate now
The
Universal Theorem Of Motion
(TUTOM) The Principle Of Motion
Preservation (Pomp) in
Absolute Vacuum: The Principle Of Absolute
Inertia (Pofai)
Material
objects, in an absolute vacuum
(AVA) medium, moving at a
constant speed or at rest,
have the natural tendency to
preserve their existing state
of motion or rest,
continuously resisting any
change of their existing state
of uniform motion or rest.
That principle of motion
preservation (pomp) in AVA
leads to the
absolute
inertia
(abin)
concept. From there, the
Principle Of Absolute Inertia
(Pofai)
emerges.
Proof:
We need to prove that in
Prena,
the
Pofai
emerges.
Motion,
by being an act of real
creation, and being part of
Prena's PriDyn,
will subscribe to all marks of
creation
(UMOCs)
enunciated above in the
4th UTPOT.
The
principle of motion
preservation (pomp)
springs from the preservation
tendency mark of creation
(PT-UMOC)
and its resistance to change
(RETOC).
That, by being done in the
absolute vacuum (AVA) medium,
will trigger the Principle
Of Absolute Inertia
(Pofai) whose subject is
no other than theabsolute
inertia
(abin)concept.
.1.
Some 2000 years ago, Aristotle
(circa 335 BC to
322 BC), who vehemently
rejected the existence of an
absolute vacuum (AVA) in
Nature, noted this much in his
book of Physics:
19.
(4) "In a void
there is no reason
why a thing should
stop here
rather than
there; so if
it moves at all, it
will move for ever."
And, 22. (5)
"Things are supposed
to move into a void
because it is
yielding; but a void
is equally yielding
everywhere, so that
there should
be movement in every
direction."
Aristotle's
Physics. Revised text with
Introduction and
commentary by Sir W.
David Ross;
1998 Oxford
University Press; pp.
380-381, §
215(a)
points 19(4) and
22(5)
Copernicus
Galileo
.2.
Many centuries latter, after
the works of Nicolaus
Copernicus and Galileo
Galilei, Isaac Newton in his
seminal Principia
(Definition III) defined
inertia, if our reading is
correct, to be
an
innate property of
matter
as follows:
"The
vis insita, or
innate
force of
matter,
is a power of
resisting, by which
every body, as much
as in it lies,
continues in its
present state,
whether it be of
rest, or of moving
uniformly forwards in
a right line."
[Underline
supplied.]
.
Newton
Sir
Isaac Newton's
Principia Motte's
Translation
University of
Calliforna Press,
1966, Vol, I, p.
2.
Newton
considered inertia
(if our reading above is
correct) to be an "innate
force" of matter. Let us make
this point clear: matter does
not possess such a thing.
Inertia, in fact, is not a
property of matter, but is a
property of motion. Motion,
and not matter, is endowed
with that "innate
force."
While it is true that both
matter and motion subscribe to
the same tendency of
preserving their respective
states (PT-UMOC)
and, that both have an
inherent resistance to change
(RETOC)
--they nevertheless reside on
totally different plateaus of
existence and, as such, they
never ever can be interchanged
one with another in a
meaningful way. This very
point is again emphasized in a
subsequent page in
here.
.3.
Another attribute given to
the
inertial force
(inforce)
is that it is not a real, but
a fictitious, force! For
starters, let us again make
this clear: Physics does not
deal with fictitious or
phantom forces or
entities!! Those type
of subjects are outside of the
realm of Physics or of any
Natural Sciences. All the
so-called pseudo-forces are
real forces that exist
in Nature. They are not
fictional, imaginary entities.
Isaac Newton brilliantly
described the inertial force
as a real force with a
dual characteristic --that of
resistance and of an
impulse as follows:
Newton's
Commentary on Inertia
Posted in his
Definition
III
"This
force is
always
proportional
to the body
whose force
it is and
differs
nothing from
the
inactivity
of mass, but
in our
manner of
conceiving
it. A body,
from the
inert nature
of matter,
is not
without
difficulty
put out of
its state of
rest or
motion. Upon
which
account,
this vis
insita
may, by a
most
significant
name, be
called
inertia
(vis
inertiæ)
or force of
inactivity.
But a body
only exerts
this force
when another
force,
impressed
upon it,
endeavors to
change its
condition;
and the
exercise of
this force
may be
considered
as
bothresistanceandimpulse;
it is
resistance
so far as
the body,
for
maintaining
its present
state,
opposes the
force
impressed;
it is
impulse
so far as
the body, by
not easily
giving way
to the
impressed
force of
another,
endeavors to
change the
state of
that other.
Resistance
is usually
ascribed to
bodies at
rest, and
impulse
to those in
motion; but
motion and
rest, as
commonly
conceived,
are only
relatively
distinguished;
nor are
those bodies
truly at
rest, which
commonly are
taken to be
so."
[Underline supplied.]
.4.
Finally, we know what inertia
is. It is not an
attribute of matter as
apparently Newton considered
to be, but is an attribute of
motion as derived in
UTOM
and amplified in the above
Remark 2.
However, let us note that
therein inertia was considered
to exist with respect to an
absolute vacuum (AVA) medium
that was well understood back
to the time of
Aristotle.
R.
Feynman
.How
the
absolute
inertia (abin)
is being transmitted from an
absolute vacuum (AVA) medium
into the cosmic material
medium of
Nature?
is a different question that
needs yet to be answered. In
short, how abin
vested in Pofaican
be transposed from the vacuum
medium into the cosmic medium
(that is not vacuum) is
the question that is
facing us. .Richard
Feynman
in his book "The Character
Of Physical Law" (MIT
Press, 1965, p. 19) noted in
fact, on that very issue, the
following:
"The
reason why
[cosmic]
things coast for ever
has never been found
out. The law of
inertia [in
the cosmic
space] has no
known
origin."
[Underline supplied.]
Thus,
Feynman's question as to WHY
objects coast forever in the
cosmic space of Nature (that
is far from being an absolute
vacuum medium), is --as
stated-- the question
that has yet to receive its
answer. And that will happen
only after we have identified
the material nature of the
cosmic space.
On
the Energy Concept
.The
concept of energy -- has been indeed an
intriguing concept that has baffled physicists,
other scientists, philosophers and thinkers for
quite some time, being unresolved, in fact, to
this very day. That state of incertitude was
perhaps best described by the late Physics Nobel
Laureate Professor Richard Feynman (photo in
here
and above) who noted this in his famous
Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley
Publishing Company, 1963) in Section 4-1
entitled "What Is Energy?," as
we quote:
"Energy
has a large number of different forms,
and there is a formula for each one.
These are: gravitational energy,
kinetic energy, heat energy, elastic
energy, electrical energy, chemical
energy, radiant energy, nuclear energy,
mass energy. If we total up the
formulas for each of these
contributions, it will not change
except for energy going in and out. It
is important to realize that in physics
today, we have no knowledge of what
energy is."
Asides from elucidating what energy
is, another fundamental line of
inquiry that comes up is this one:
All
forms of energy that have been
identified in Nature must arguably have
a common source of
primeval
energy (primen)
as
Nature's energy, pursuant to the
substantive
foundational mark of creation
(SF-UMOC),
could not have been created or infused
out of Nothingness(an
entity devoid of everything, but its
own existence).
And
the place to look for that
primen
must be, no other, than
Prena
--the
state of
the
preexisting Nature.
So, as you can see, we have a full plate in
front of us!
Currently, energy
is being defined as the "ability"to do work or create heat. Well, that
definition of energy is not acceptable on the
grounds that it lacks any physical substratum
being par excellence a non-physical
definition that needs to reside outside of the
realm of Physics. Indeed, the "ability" or
"disability" to do something cannot stand in
lieu of a physical parameter, property, or
entity. As such, energy cannot be defined as an
ability of some sort, but it must be
defined as being something else having a
physical origin and connotation.
Therefore, our quest in elucidating the energy
concept must be centered in discovering its
physicality that must exist and, as such,
it need not be embedded or associated with our
mental existence.
! PASS
WITH
MUCH CARE
We
begin our quest in elucidating the physical
nature of the primeval
energy (primen)
by noting first that the Collision
of various xenobase
(XB)
blocks, which is a natural occurrence in
Prena,
carries with it a hit force, called hitoforce
(hF).
That
hitoforce
(hF),
upon impact on an unconstrainedxenobase
(XB)
block, will not vanish transforming into
Nothingness,
but, by Newton's First
Law Of Motion (FLOM),
it will transform into an
inertial
force (inforce)
of impingement.
G.
W. Leibnitz
.
The hitoforce
(hF)
can be viewed, to use Gottfried Wilhelm
Leibnitz lingo, as a "living force"
(from Latin "vis viva") or,
in our parlance, as a "moving
force."
In
Classical Physics, that
"vis
viva" or
"moving"
force eventually evolved and renamed as the
energy of motion force which is known
today as the kinetic
energy of motion
or
simply as the kinetic
energy
(kinen).
That kinen
is an "active" energy in the sense
that is inherently associated with
motion.
In TRUTON, we call
"ergo"
force, that "vis
viva"force,
which is denoted herein as ergoforce
(erF).
When
a stricken xenobase
(XB)
block is constrained and resist motion, the
associated hitoforce
(hF),
upon impact, will not disappear and transform
into Nothingness,
but it will infuse and diffuse into the
XB-block
generating a qualitative new mass --the
xenofluid (XF) mass. That infused and
diffusedhitoforce
(hF)
into
the xenobase
(XB)
creates
a field force called ergofield (erF) that
can also be viewed as a field dispersedergoforce (erF).
.
It is important to recognize that the
Collision,
which generated the
xenofluid
(XF)
mass, endowed that mass with an
ErgoStorage
--a foundational concept of matter
that needs to be differentiated from
prematter.
We call that
infused ergofield
(erF)
into a defined volume as being the field
ergoenergy (erE)stored in that
volume.
If that initial volume is
absolute
vacuum
(AVA),
then that infusedAVA
with ergoenergy
(erE)transforms itself into an
energyvacuum field (vacfield) called
ergovoid (erV).
If that initial volume is
xenobase
(XB),
then that infusedXB
with ergoenergy
(erE) becomes
xenofluid (XF) or ergofluid
(erFL).
In
short, we say that a
xenofluid
(XF)
mass is a xenobase
(XB)
mass infused with ergoenergy
(erE).
We
call xenogel (XG) the maximum
"up" density value of the
xenofluid
(XF)
and call xenothin (XT) its
minimum "down" density
value.
The
primal ergoenergy
(erE)
in Prena
emerged as the resultant of an infused
compressional
force (comforce)
of impingement into a
xenobase
(XB)
mass that opposes resistance to motion. We can
talk then about the density of the
ergoenergy
(erE),
called ergodensity (erD), that
corresponds to the strength or the
power of the generating
hitoforce
(hF).
We
call ergomass (erM) a
xenosubstance
(XS)
endowed with ergoenergy
(erE)
and call ergolev (erL) the magnitude
level of that ergoenergy
(erE).
The
compression of a xenobase
(XB)
mass cannot go
indefinitely,
as it will exist a maximum finite limit of
compression when the compressed XB(or
the compressed xenofluid)
will transform into a new state called, as
introduced, the xenorigid
(XR).
There,
in the xenorigid
(XR),
its ergoenergy
(erE)
is said to be locked-in and call that locked-in
ergoenergy, the ergolock (erLok). The
xenorigid
(XR)
therefore is said to be endowed with
locked-in ergoenergy, i.e., with the
erLok.
The
mobile,
unlocked,
or "liberated"
ergoenergy
(erE)
is called the ergolib
(erLib).
Remarks:
1)The
ergolib
(erLib)
of the
xenorigid
(XR)
is
null being ergo-locked and
write this as
erLib(XR)=0. 2)The
ergolib
(erLib)
of the
xenofluid
(XF)
is its
ergolev
(erL)
and write this as
erLib(XF)=erE(XF). 3)The
ergolib
(erLib)
of the
xenobase
(XB)
mass is also null being
either
tensioned (see
BAREC)
and, as such,
locked or being
pristine, never
infused with
ergoenergy
(erE).
.
We
write this as
erLib(XB)=0.
Thus, the ergoenergy
(erE)
encompasses both the
ergolock
(erLok)
and the ergoLib.
We can write this as
erE=erLok+erLib.
For
an absolute
vacuum
(AVA)
domain that is infused with an
ergofield
(erF),
we obtain the corresponding
ergovoid
(erV)
with its ergolev (erL)
being the magnitude of the infused
ergofield
(erF).
More details on the
ergovoid
(erV)
are
below.
We call ergosea (erS), the arena of
existence (arex) of the
ergoenergy
(erE)
of the environmental xenofluid (eXF)
medium that is above the
xenobase
(XB)
line.
The
ergofield
(erF),
i.e., the
ergoforce
(erF)that is ingrained into the xenofluid (XF) is
responsible for creating the XF's tendency to
decompress and diffuse to a so-called
baselevel (BALE) state called the
ergobase
(erB)
state that is the state of the
tensioned
xenobase (tXB)
created by the inertia
of decompression (inerdec).
The motor of that tendency to decompress is
therefore due to the xenofluid's ingrained
ergoforce
(erF)
that plays here the role of fordec.
We
call that tendency of the
xenofluid
(XF)
to decompress to its
ergobase
(erB)
state,
therenormalization
(RENO) property of
XF
which, by the way, has nothing to do with the
renormalization of Quantum Field theory of
Quantum Mechanics. RENO
exists because of the
ergoenergy
(erE)
imbedded
into the xenofluid
(XF) that
has the tendency to diffuse until it reaches the
xenobase
(XB)
state.
By
the dispersion property of erE,
fueling the dynamics of
environmental
xenofluid (eXF),
called ergodynamics (erdy), we introduce
now the DownLevel (Downlev) law
reflecting eXF's
down level tendency to decompress due to the
existence of the ingrained
ergoforce
(erF)
that plays the role of fordec.
As such, RENO
of eXF
is a straightforward derivative of
Downlev
which
has its seeds in gupem.
Remark:
Let us note that
Downlev's
arena of existence
(arex)
is
the ergosea
(erS).
Outside the "boundaries" of the
ergosea
(erS),
"below"
or
"above," Downlev
does
not exist!
Continuing, we note that there is another
recognition that needs to be made --namely, the
recognition that a hitoforce
(hF)
upon impact on a XB-block that opposes no
resistance to motion, it will not travel with,
be attached to, or be imbedded or infused into
the stricken XB-block. That recognition was most
eloquently articulated by Newton, when
explaining inertia,
in his seminal Principia (Definition IV,
ibidem),
where he noted:
"This
force consists in the action only, and
remains no longer in the body when the
action is over. For a body maintains
every new state it acquires, by its
inertia only."
.Remark:
It is important to stress and
differentiate between the case when the
XB-block opposes and resist motion and
the case when it is not. 1)In
the former case, when resistance to
motion does exist, Newton assertion
that the force "remains no longer in
the body"
! DO
NOT
OVERPASS
is no longer correct as the
hitoforce
(hF),
as we have seen, stays now in the body
and transforms itself
into
ergoenergy (erE)
and the body's mass is being
transformed into a new type of mass
called ergomass
(erM).
The xenofluid
(XF)
is the "active"
erMwhile
the xenorigid
(XR)
is the "inactive"
erMas
being "frozen" or
"locked-up."
2)
Now, in the latter case, when the
XB-block does not opposes any
resistance to a
hitoforce
(hF),
Newton
does not tell what actually did happen
with that hitoforce
(hF).
The only thing that he mentioned was
that that hitoforce (hF), upon the hit,
is "no longer in the body when the
action is over."
Well,
we still need to know what actually did
happen with that hitoforce (hF). As
such, the question that requires an
answer is this: Upon the hit,
WHAT
actually did happen to that detached
hitoforce
(hF)?
As
already noted, we know from the
permanent
existential mark of creation
(PE-UMOC)
that something that was created (in this
case, the hitoforce) cannot vanish and
transform into Nothingness.
Thus, in this case, we have to ask this
question that is facing us:
.Into
what that hitoforce
(hF)
will be transformed into?
Well,
the answer is that the separated
hitoforce
(hF)
from the stricken XB-block will diffuse into
the surrounding vacuum generating a
force-field, called
ergofield
(erF),
until it reaches its
baselevel
(BALE)
state called basefield
(BAFI).
xenovoid/basevoid
"cloud"
Base
That ergofield
(erF)
infused into an
absolute
vacuum
(AVA)
medium, called
ergovoid
(erV),
will decompress to the lowest finite
base limit level of decompression
called, the
ergobase
(erB)state, creating the
basevacuum
field (vacfield)
entity,
called the xenovoid (XV) or
the basevoid (BV)
entity.
The
ergofield
(erF)
at its ergobase
(erB)
level of existence is called, as
stated,
basefield
(BAFI).
The extent of the created
basefield
(BAFI)
is function of the strength of the
hitoforce
(hF):
the greater its magnitude is, the
greater that extent of the created
BAFI is going to
be.
BBase
Thus, to recap, the
xenovoid
(XV)or the
basevoid
(BV),
by being at the lowest attainable
field density, is the maximum
decompressed
ergovoid
(erV)
whose sustratum is the
ergobase
(erB).
As such, now we can talk about the
invisible
basevacuum
field (vacfield)
"clouds"of
xenovoid
(XV)
or basevoid
(BV)
that are "floating" in the cosmic
absolute vacuum (CAV)
medium.
It is important to stress
that the
basevacfields"clouds"
(aka the XV-clouds)
are of various sizes
corresponding to the
magnitude of the
ergofields
(erFs)
that created them.
It is also important to
recognize that those
XV-clouds
cannot be assimilated by
their
absolute
vacuum
(AVA)
medium as they are
autonomous entities.
PASS WITH
MUCH CARE
A
fundamental characteristic
of a
basefield
(BAFI),
and thus of the new type of
vacuum --the
xenovoid
(XV),
is that, by being at the
lowest attainable field
density, it can no longer
be decompressed (and thus
be stretched) any
further.
Grid
Lattice 3D
structures
xenovoid's
basenet
That
creates a rather subtle
invisible impenetrable
radiation field
wall,
called basenet
(figure at right). Any
radiation entering into a
xenovoid
(XV)
to
propagate will encounter
that impenetrable
basenet
of a grid lattice
(gridlat) 3D structure.
The result is that a
radiation entering into a
xenovoid
(XV)
will no longer be able to
propagate linearly as it
will splatter on the
basenet
propagating radially
perpendicular to the
direction of motion. A
perpetual perpendicular
bouncing will take
place.
Thus,
because of the
basenet,
a perpendicular wave
propagation is being
created, that is at the
substratum of the
electromagnetic
field
(elfi)
radiation.
BAFI
can be compressed but not
decompressed and call
bafiflex that
unilateral flexibility. The
xenobase
(XB)
is also endowed with the
same
bafiflex
property
being ingrained with the
material rather than
fieldbasenet. BAFI
has been recognized to be
the substratum of
xenovoid
(XV)
named also
basevoid
(BV).
And that implies that the
XV/BV
is endowed with some sort
of
baselevel
(BALE)
vacuum energy called herein
ergovoid
(erV).
The
existence of such
"vacuum energy"
was first
recognized to
exist by
Hendrik B. G. Casimir
with
Dirk Polder
by detecting field
fluctuations in
vacuum in an
experiment, that
was repeated many
times over, and
referred today as
the Casimir
effect.
Fundamental Remark
(FUREM): While
xenovoid
(XV)
cannot be
stretched, it
opposes no
resistance to
being penetrated
by a material
object. So
material objects,
unlike the
ergofield
(erF)
radiation, can
travel unabated
through a
xenovoid
(XV)
volume.
That
distinction
between
the
moving
material
objects
and the
emitted
ergofield
(erF)radiation
reveals
the
subtility
of the
basenet
(that
resides
at the
lowest
density
level) in
the two
platforms:
the
material
one
(i.e.,
the
xenobasebasenet)
and, the
field
one
(i.e.,
the
xenovoid/basevoidbasenet).
Finally,
we note that the "fabric"
of the
xenovoid
(XV),
that is the
basefield
(BAFI),
can never ever be able to
be transformed into
Nothingness,
i.e., into a volume
of
absolute
vacuum
(AVA).
And that is because of the
permanent
existential mark of
creation
(PE-UMOC)
which guarantees the
xenovoid's
permanent state of
existence.
The
physical existence of the
ergoforce/ergofield
(erF)
introduced above was pioneered by Michael
Faraday and James Clerk Maxwell in
their studies of electromagnetism and
below, we present a succinct historical note
viewed through the lens of TRUTON.
Michael
Faraday
was the first, and perhaps the only one, to
recognize of the real
existence
of the force-field polysemy, as a
stand-alone
physical entity, in his studies of the magnetic
and electric force/fields and of their
unification into the electromagnetic
force/fields. In fact, Faraday became more and
more convinced during his life of the
physical
reality
of those 'force fields' whose nature, in the
end, he considered to be a substance of some
sort through which the "lines of force"
(electric or magnetic) show their
existence.
J.
C. Maxwell
On the other hand,
James
Clerk Maxwell
in his famous 4-part paper "On Physical Lines
of Force" that is modeled on the
"lines
of force"
introduced by Faraday, and where the famous
tensor
equations of electromagnetism are being
introduced, would not subscribe to the Faraday's
conjecture of a stand-alone
physical entity for the
force-field
polysemy.
Maxwell
instead, in his approach of finding a tensorial
representation for the transmission of electric
and magnetic forces, considered those
transmissions to be states of stress and strain
that were produced in the assumed aether medium
of Nature.
That
physical reality envisioned by Maxwell,
following into the steps of Faraday, vanished
completely with the advent of
Einstein's
Relativity
which eliminated the existence of the aether
medium altogether and replaced it,
astonishingly, with Nothingness.
With that elimination of a non-void medium of
Nature, as advanced by Einstein
some 100 years ago, Physics has been sucked
in entering into an unfathomable dark path of
the abyss from where now it must find its way
out...
Max
Planck
It
is indeed the aim of TRUTON not only
to dethrone the lunatic
Einstein's Relativity,
but also to pull back Physics from
the "Black Hole" that it has fallen
into. Its golden and rather
tumultuous rational path of
advancement eventually needs to
surface and reign supreme
again...
Viewed
from the vista of TRUTON, both Faraday and
Maxwell exhibited a correct physical
representation of the force-field polysemy with
Maxwell's representation being a direct and
straightforward inference derived from Faraday's
monumental stand-alone
conjecture.
Indeed, the
aether medium, that in TRUTON is the xenofluid
(XF) medium, exists because it contains
ergoenergy
(erE)
that was infused at XF's birth with the
stand-alone
ergoforce/ergofield (erF). However, the
stand-alone
ergoforce/ergofield (erF) can be infused not
only into a xenobase (XB) block to create the
xenofluid (XF), but it also can be infused into
an absolute
vacuum (AVA)
that exists in Prena
(pN)
generating an ergovoid
(erV).
The
ergovoid
(erV)
upon decompression reaching the base level state
--the ergobase
(erB)--
transforms itself into a base level ergovoid
(erV) called xenovoid
(XV).Through
that "ergo"
vista, we are able to see now the parity that
exists between the material
and non-material
environments
as follows:
TRUTON's
In
Prena (devoid of
ergoenergy):
In
Nature (infused with
ergoenergy):
Material
Xenobase
(XB)
Xenofluid(XF)
Xenorigid (XR)
Non-Material
Absolute
Vacuum (AVA)
Ergovoid
(erV)
Xenovoid (XV)
An
entity (material or non-material)
infused with
ergoenergy
(erE)
is called an ergoentity
(erEN).
Thus, ergoentities (erENs)
could be either a
ergomass
(xenofluid/ergofluid or
xenorigid/ergorigid)
or
an ergovoid.
In TRUTON, to avoid the confusion with the
'field concept' employed in Mathematics, we
shall use, for the
'field'
to be employed in Physics, the terminology of
'ergofield'.
Also to distinguish the concept of
'force'
employed in Mechanics or Mathematics from the
one to be used in Physics, we will use in
here the 'ergoforce'
nomenclature. The
"ergo"
prefix always will have the connotation of
possessing 'energy'.
That "ergo"
nomenclature is very much in tune with
Leibnitz's"vis viva" ("living force")
lingo.
In
the classical non-trutonian lingo, the
three (3) resultant acts of creation
springing from the
hitoforce
(hF)
--the motion, the xenofluid, and the
ergovoid-- as diverse as they are, have
a commonality among them, namely, that
they are endowed, at their birth, with
something that is called
primal
energy (primen).
The energy resulted from motion is
called mechanical energy, the
one resulted from xenofluid is called
the material energy, and the one
resulted from the dispersion of force
is called the field
energy.
Thus, in summary, we come to the
recognition that
primal
energy (primen)
exists in three (3) basic
forms:
that of a
motion,
called the mechanical energy,
energy of motion, or the
kinetic
energy;
that of a
substance,
called ergosubstance
(ES)
--seated either in the
xenofluid
(XF)
that, if unconstrained, will
free completely its acquired
ergoenergy
(erE)
returning back to its
baselevel
(BALE)
state of existence --the
xenobase
(XB),
or in the
xenorigid
(XR)
that entraps and
freezes/immobilizes its
acquired
ergoenergy
(erE)
transforming it into
frozen energy
(frE), and
that of a
field,
called ergofield
(erF)
--seated in the
ergovoid
(erV)
that will diffuse into the
xenovoid
(XV)
state.
Thus, the conversion of a
hitoforce
(hF)
could be vested in the creation of a
new motion (potential or kinetic)
called the
dynamic
conversion,OR could be vested in the
creation of a field, the
ergofield
(erF),
called the
field
conversion,
that when infused into an absolute
vacuum (AVA) will generate the
xenovoid
(XV) and,
when infused into a xenobase (XB)
generating a
substance
conversion
vested in the creation of a new
substance that is the
xenofluid
(XF)
or the xenorigid
(XR).
Let
us note that the conversion of
a
hitoforce
(hF)
needs not be confused with its
effect that it can have in
various situations. For
instance, the non-elastic
deformations or the fractures
are the effect-results of a
released energy that need not
be confused with the energy
itself.
Those
three (3) forms in which
primal
energy (primen)
can exist
---motion-substance-field--
shows the complex multifaceted
existence of energy.
Additional
Remarks:
.The
xenobase
(XB)
mass has been defined as a material continuum of
the lowest existing density that can only be
compressed but not decompressed or stretched. On
the other extreme, we call xenorigid
(XR)
the maximum compressed xenosubstance
(cXS). Collectively, all those three
introduced states
--the
xenobase (XB), xenofluid (XF), and the
xenorigid (XR)
are said to form the states of existence of the
xenosubstance (XS). .Using
the "ergo"
terminology that is applicable only for the
compressed
xenosubstance
(cXS),
we get the ergosubstance (ES) with its
states of existence --the
ergofluid
(erFL)
and ergorigid (ER). .The
extreme states of existence of the
xenosubstance
(XS),
the xenobase
(XB)
--that is the maximum decompressed tensioned
state of the XS and the
xenorigid
(XR)
-- that is the maximum compressed state of XS,
have one common characteristic namely that they
are capable of entrapping (without the
possibility of escape) their acquired
ergoenergy
(erE).
.We
call xentropy that
ironclad-entrapment of
ergoenergy
(erE)
by the tensioned
xenobase (tXB)
and by the
xenorigid
(XR).
Those two extremes states of the
xenosubstance
(XS)
freeze their respective acquired
ergoenergies
(erEs)
making them, in both cases, unavailable
to be released.
.We
can talk thus of the
xentropy
of
the xenobase
called basetropy and, of
thexentropy
of
the
xenorigid
called uptropy. The introduced
frozen
energy (frE)
is the result of
xentropy.
Note:
The name
"xentropy"
was borrowed from the entropy
concept of Thermodynamics representing
the "thermodynamic quantity" that is
not available to be converted into
mechanical work by the system's thermal
energy.
After
all this, we mark now our stated recognition on
the energy's multifaceted existence into
.
The
Seventh
Universal Transcendental Principle Of
TRUTON
(7th UTPOT):
On Energy's Multifaceted
Existence
A hitoforce upon striking a xenobase
(XB) block will not cease its existence
as it will convert into a
motion,
or into a
substance,
or into a
field.
The transmission of the three (3)
possible conversions of the
hitoforce
(hF)
will generate three (3) new and
distinct capabilities called
respectively the
mechanical,
the material,
and the
field
energies.
The commonality
of all those three (3) forms of energy
is that they all spring from a
transformed hitoforce that is being
carried on a final resting place of
existence.
Fundamental Additional Remarks: .
H.
Poincaré
H.
Lorentz
As
matter
and motion
concepts cannot possibly be confused
one with another, so are their
corresponding energy concepts --the
substance energy of matter
(aka,
the material
energy)
and the energy of
motion
(aka, the mechanical or kinetic
energy)of a mass (with mass defined as the
object's quantity of matter). Those
two concepts not only that they cannot
possibly be confused one with another,
but also that they cannot be transposed
one into another. .
Henri Poincaré's
mass-energy formula
E=mc2 and his
"principle of relativity" of
1904 was lifted in 1905 by
Albert
Einstein
and introduced into his
Special
Theory of Relativity
(STR)
without any reference to
Poincaré's work. No coherent
meaningful physical proof of
that implausible formula was ever been
provided by Einstein nor, for that
matter, by anyone else. .
That the (internal, ingrained)
energy
of a block of mass (defined as the
quantity of matter per its volume) can
somehow be calculated from a formula
containing the speed of light
c is to us such an
absurdity that no person, in his/her
normal state of mind, could ever fall
into such an unfathomable abyss. What
possible association,
relationship, correlation or connection
could exist between the
substance energy of a
mass and the speed of
light? To be able to entertain such a
question, one indeed must fall and
enter into the arena of the Absurd as
only there that kind of question can
possible reside. (Such absurd
association
of the speed
of
light
could only be surpassed by the one with
the Giza
Pyramid
of the ancient Egypt!)
The mathematical
proof that subsequently
emerged for the noted
mass-energy formula
E=mc2
was
designed for the
kinetic
and not the
material
energy
and, it was based on a
relativistic foundation
initiated by Hendrik
Lorentz incorporating
mentalkinetic
frames of reference. Those
mathematical
transformations performed
through that mental
framework, known as the
Lorentz
transformations, which
Poincaré
considered them to be of
"supreme importance" laid
in fact the foundation for
Poincaré's stated
"principle
of relativity." .That
stated mass-energy
mathematical formula
E=mc2that now
incorrectly is being
attributed to
Einstein
is, at best, a fictitious
mathematical formula
that has nothing to do with
the reality of Nature as it
was derived from
mathematical and not
physical frames of
references that exist only
in our Mind, but absent in
Nature.
.To
extrapolate a
mathematical result
(derived from a
mentalkinetic
frames of reference
foundation) to a
physical reality
describing Nature is indeed
an act of shear insanity as
the fundamental laws Nature
exist and operate
independently of our own
existence, much less of how
we, humans, see or perceive
its reality from our
various mental
frames of reference that we
can create independent from
the physical reality
of Nature!
[Indeed,
the Advanced
Mathematics has no
concern whatsoever
over the
physical
reality of
Nature as its
theories are build
upon foundations
that may have
nothing, but
absolutely
nothing, in common
with the
physical
reality of
Nature!]
.Furthermore,
a
kinetic
foundation cannot possibly
be transposed to represent
a formula for calculating
the inherent
internal substance
energy of matter, i.e., for
calculating its
ergoenergy
(erE).
Indeed, the
substance
energy
of a material block need
not be a function of its
state of motion or rest nor
of whether it is being
referenced to a particular
mental frame of reference
compared to
another!
..In
TRUTON, the
mass-energy
equivalency
is divided (or dissected, if you will)
into two distinct components:
an external one, where
mass (or better, inertial
mass) is being associated
with its external motion in
space leading to the
equivalency of
(inertial)
mass
with its
kinetic
energy;
and
an internal one,
leading to the (noted below)
matter-ergoenergy
equivalency,
where mass is associated with
its quantity of matter, as a
substance, leading to the
equivalency of matter with its
internal energy. That
equivalency springs from the
recognition that the fabric of
matter (as oppose to
prematter)
is ingrained, from its birth,
with
ergoenergy
(erE).
Einstein's
attributed energy
formula
E=mc2
(that was first
introduced, as
noted,
by
Henri
Poincarè)
purporting to show
the equivalence of
energy with
mass
is, as noted above,
an exercise into the
Absurd.
How the speed of
light
c
could possible have
anything to do with
the energy
E
of an arbitrary mass
m
is anybody's guess.
Do we have any
takers? .
BTW,
By that lunatic
energy formula,
particles (such as
photons) whose mass
is assumed to be
zero, will have
arguably zero energy
[sic!].
How more absurd it
can get?
On
the Predisposition of Matter (Predma)
in the Embryonal Nature
(Embryna)
As
already recognized, the Collision
carries with it an underneath non-observable
agent --the hitoforce
(hF).
Through that agent, as we have seen, how the
ergoenergy
(erE)
was
able to be created in the fabric of both the
material world (creating the
xenofluid)
and in the non-material field world (creating
the xenovoid).
Thus, both the xenofluid (XF) and xenovoid (XV)
are endowed with energy. The recognition that
energy can be a substance (xenofluid) and
also a field (xenovoid) is remarkable
indeed. With that recognition at hand, we can
now introduce the concept of embryonal matter
(eM).
The
concept of prematter
(pM)
introduced in the previous page and
mentioned above in our first paragraph was
defined as being the admixture of the
xenobase
(XB)
and the absolute
vacuum (AVA)
and, we wrote that symbolically as:
pM={XB, AVA}.
Prena (pN)
now could be defined as the entity whose sole
ingredient is the prematter.
Now,
we define the embryonal matter
(eM)
as being the admixture of xenofluid (XF) and
ergovoid/xenovoid
(erV/XV) and write this symbolically as:
eM={XF, erV/XV}.
The fundamental characteristic of
eM
is
that it is endowed
withenergy
--the ergoenergy
(erE).
Now, with the introduction of
eM,
we define the embryonal Nature
(eN),
called Embryna, as the entity evolved
from Prena
(pN)
whose ingredient is the embryonal matter
(eM
)
and nothing else. Prena
now can be viewed as being the primeval
Nature entity.
We
stress again of the dramatic difference between
the prematter
(pM)
and embryonal matter
(eM)
which is that the embryonal matter, as oppose to
the prematter, is endowed with
ergoenergy
(erE).
! MUST
NOT
OVERPASS
.
The fact that the embryonal
matter
(eM)
is infused with ergoenergy
(erE)
whose incarnation is the
ergofield
(erF)
whose tendency is to decompress to its
ergobase
(erB)
state, it follows --by the 7th UTPOT--
that the behaviour of the embryonal matter
(eM),
and thus of the matter itself, is dictated by
the stated tendency of the
ergofield
(erF).
And that recognition is most remarkable indeed,
as now we can talk about the given
brute matter'spredisposition
(gupem)
of
residing at the xenobase
(XB)
state of existence --the
baselevel
(BALE)
state,
renamed the ergobase
(erB),
that is the bottom of its
ergosea
(erS).
That
predisposed (gupem)
conduit of matter, that is not
xenorigid
(XR),is being now recognized into
.
The
Eight Universal
Transcendental
Principle Of TRUTON
(8th UTPOT):
Matter's Ultimate Baselevel Conduit
--the Basevolution
Unlocked
compressed xenosubstance (cXS)
has one singular predisposed
conduit
--that
of reaching and staying at the
baselevel
(BALE)
state,
called also the
ergobase
(erB)
state.
We call
basevolution
that ultimate baselevel
conduit of matter that is the
Downlev
law which, as noted, has its
substratum in
gupem.
Remarks: .1.
Xenofluid's
basevolution,
in its simplest form of expression, is
vested in its stated
renormalization
(RENO)
tendency to decompress in
accordance to the existence of
fordec
that is being channeled through the
existence of the
ergoforce
(erF). .2.Because
of RENO,
the xenofluid (XF) will acquire a
resistance to compression
(RECO) that is consistent with a
resistance
to change (RETOC),
limited in strength, as formulated in
the posted
resistance
limit mark of creation
(RL-UMOC).
.3.As
recognized, the
ergolib(erLib)
of the ergobase
(erB),
that is the state of the
xenobase
(XB),
is null.
The
First
Fundamental Universal Scholium of
Nature
(1st
FUSON):
Evolution
VS.
Basevolution
Evolution,
is
nothing but the continuous
struggle against the
basevolution.
Thus, evolution can only occur
when and where
basevolution
is being able to be defeated.
The farther away the evolution
is from the baselevel line,
the higher the evolution is
said to be. Evolution, at all
time, must be able to keep in
check and overcome
basevolution.
The recognition that
the
ergolib (erLib)
is the ultimate
coalescent of Nature
(coaleson)
is now being recognized 1)
as the ergo
facet
of the 4th
FURON
through
The
Foundational Complementary Facet of the
4th
FURON:
Ulticom Ergolibas
theUltimate
Communicator (ulticom)
of
Nature
Ergolib
(erLib)),
by being the integral part of both
mattter
and motion
without which they could not exist
independently, represents the
ultimate
substratum and common denominator
(CODE) through which the
ultimate
bridge of communication (BOC) between
them is being established, making it,
therefore, as the
ultimate
communicator (ulticom)
of
Nature.
2)
as the ergo
facet
of thePrinciple
of Matter-Ergoenergy
Equivalency:
Both
the embryonal
matter
and ergoenergy
(erE)
are deriving their existence from the
same primal agent --the
Collision,
the primeval
agent of creation
(PAC).
As such, they are said to be equivalent
in rapport to their origin of
existence. In a formal way, we say that
matter
and ergoenergy are equivalent
modulo their
existence.
We
have defined regular mass
as the
quantityofregular
matter
in a body. As such, from the
mass-ergoenergy
equivalence,
we infer that the
mass
of an object is a measure of its
ergoenergy
content.
The
SixthFoundational
Universal Recognition Of
Nature
(6thFURON): Ergolib
as the maker of the
Ergo
Median Platform of Nature
(EMPON)
Ergolib
(erLib),
by being an integral part of
"unfrozen" matter and thus, by
subscribing to
basevolution,
it will channel its
ergoflow
(erFLO),
by Downlev,
to create a common median
ergodense
(erD)
platform, called
ergo
median platform of Nature
(EMPON),
between the high and low
ergodense
objects that are in contact.
We call
ergoleveling
that process creating
EMPON.
Remarks: 1.The simplest example of
EMPON
is the temperature flow and transfer
between "hot" and "cold" objects in
contact or confined into a closed
system. More subtle examples of
ergoleveling
EMPONprocesses
will be revealed when the
proton-electron and proton-proton
interactions are to be studied in a not
too distant page.
2.EMPONis the result
of
an ergolevelingflow,
called ergoflow (erFLO),
dictated by Downlev.
We have called
ergodynamics
(erdy)
the study of the
erFLOdynamics.
3.The ultimate EMPON
is the baselevel material platform,
called BASEPON, representing the
xenobase (XB)
platform.
Finally,
we note that the recognized baselevelpredisposition
of
existence for
matter (gupem)
needs
to be expanded to incorporate the other
component of ergoentity
(erEN)
--the
ergovoid
(erV).
Thus, with that expanded recognition, we have
arrived at the global ergoentitypredisposition of Nature (gepon) that
incorporate both
environmental ergo-media:
the material medium (vested in the
environmental
xenofluid (eXF)
medium],
and
the non-material medium [vested in
the ergovoid
(erV)
medium].
That baselevel gepon
will
channel both ergo-media
to reach their respective
baselevel
(BALE)
states: the xenobase
(XB)
and the xenovoid
(XV),
respectively. With that new vista, we are able
now to see that Downlev,
RENO,
and basevolution
are all equivalent in Nature modulogepon.